Galgotias University Apologises After Robotic Dog Claim Sparks AI Summit Row
Galgotias University issued a public apology after a controversy erupted at the Delhi AI Summit over claims that it developed a robotic dog, later identified as a Chinese manufactured model.

- Galgotias University clarifies it did not develop the robotic dog.
- University says misinformation was shared by an unauthorised representative.
- AI Summit organisers asked the university to vacate its stall.
A controversy at the Delhi AI Summit forced Galgotias University to issue an official apology after incorrect claims were made about a robotic dog showcased at the event. The university admitted that misleading information was shared by one of its representatives without proper technical knowledge.
The issue surfaced when a professor at the Galgotias University stall claimed that the robotic dog had been developed by the university’s Centre of Excellence. The statement quickly drew attention and criticism, as experts pointed out that the robot was actually the Unitree Go2, a globally known robotic dog manufactured by China based Unitree Robotics.
As the clarification gained traction, summit organisers intervened and asked Galgotias University to vacate its exhibition stall. The incident triggered sharp reactions on social media and within academic circles, questioning credibility and transparency at a major technology platform.
Responding to the backlash, the university management stated that the individual who spoke to the media was not an authorised spokesperson. It explained that the representative lacked proper understanding of the robotic system and shared inaccurate details out of enthusiasm to interact with the press.
Galgotias University emphasised that it never officially claimed ownership or development of the robotic dog and expressed regret over the confusion caused. The institution said it respects innovation ethics and acknowledged the need for stricter communication protocols at high profile events.
Whether the apology will fully settle the controversy remains to be seen, but the episode has sparked a broader discussion on accountability and verification at national level technology summits.





